Proposition A1

The ring Z[5]\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}] is isomorphic to Z[t]/(t2+5).\mathbb{Z}[t]/(t^2 + 5).

Proof

Since t2+5t^2 + 5 is monic, we can use division algorithm to find the value of any element fZ[t]/(t2+5)f \in \mathbb{Z}[t]/(t^2 + 5) modulo the relation. Hence, every such element can be written in the form a+bta + bt for a,bZ.a,b \in \mathbb{Z}.

Thus, for every element of Z[t]/(t2+5)\mathbb{Z}[t]/(t^2 + 5) we can find a corresponding element of Z[5]\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}] by mapping a+bta + bt to a+b5.a + b\sqrt{-5}. This gives us a bijective set function τ:Z[t]/(t2+5)Z[5].\tau : \mathbb{Z}[t]/(t^2 + 5) \to \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}].

We can verify directly that this function is a homomorphism:

τ((a1+b1t)+(a2+b2t))=τ((a1+a2)+(b1+b2)t)=(a1+a2)+(b1+b2)5=a1+b15+a2+b25=τ(a1+b1t)+τ(a2+b2t),\begin{align*} \tau((a_1 + b_1t) + (a_2 + b_2t)) &= \tau((a_1 + a_2) + (b_1 + b_2)t) \\ &= (a_1 + a_2) + (b_1+b_2)\sqrt{-5} \\ &= a_1 + b_1\sqrt{-5} + a_2 +b_2\sqrt{-5} \\ &= \tau(a_1 + b_1t) + \tau(a_2 + b_2 t), \end{align*} τ((a1+b1t)(a2+b2t))=τ(a1a2+a1b2t+b1ta2+b1b2t2)=τ((a1a25b1b2)+(a1b2+b1a2)t)=(a1a25b1b2)+5(a1b2+b1a2)=a1a2+a1b25+b15a2+b1b2(5)2=(a1+b15)(a2+b25)=τ(a1+b1t)τ(a2+b2t),\begin{align*} \tau((a_1 + b_1t) \cdot (a_2 + b_2t)) & = \tau(a_1a_2 + a_1b_2t + b_1ta_2 + b_1b_2t^2) \\ &= \tau((a_1a_2 - 5b_1b_2) + (a_1b_2 + b_1a_2)t) \\ &= (a_1a_2 - 5b_1b_2) + \sqrt{-5}(a_1b_2 + b_1a_2) \\ &= a_1a_2 + a_1b_2\sqrt{-5} + b_1\sqrt{-5} a_2 + b_1b_2\left(\sqrt{-5}\right)^2 \\ &= \left(a_1 + b_1 \sqrt{-5}\right) \cdot \left(a_2 + b_2 \sqrt{-5}\right) \\ &= \tau(a_1 + b_1t) \cdot \tau(a_2 + b_2t), \end{align*} τ(1+0t)=1+05=1.\tau(1 + 0t) = 1 + 0\sqrt{-5} = 1.

A bijective ring homomorphism is an isomorphism.

\blacksquare

Proposition A2

R=Z[t]/(t2+5)R = \mathbb{Z}[t]/(t^2 + 5) is a Noetherian integral domain.

Proof

By theorem 1.2 we know that Z\mathbb{Z} being Noetherian implies that Z[t]/(t2+5)\mathbb{Z}[t]/(t^2 + 5) is Noetherian.

Suppose a,bRa, b \in R are such that ab=0.ab = 0. Transporting a,ba, b over to the isomorphic ring Z[5]\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}] we get a1+a25a_1 + a_2\sqrt{-5} and b1+b25b_1 + b_2\sqrt{-5} such that their product is zero. But Z[5]\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}] is a subring of C\mathbb{C} and we know that C\mathbb{C} is a field, hence has no zero divisors.

\blacksquare

Proposition A3

Let N:Z[5]ZN : \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}] \to \mathbb{Z} be the map a+b5a2+5b2.a + b\sqrt{-5} \mapsto a^2 + 5b^2. Then NN is a homomorphism of multiplicative monoids.

Proof

Let s=5.s = \sqrt{-5}.

Observe that N(a+bs)=(a+bs)(abs)=(a+bs)(a+bs),N\left(a + bs\right) = \left(a + bs\right)\left(a - bs\right) = \left(a + bs\right)\overline{\left(a + bs\right)}, where x\overline{x} denotes the complex conjugate of x.x.

Let u,vZ[5],u, v \in \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}], then

N(uv)=uv(uv)=uvuv=uuvv=N(u)N(v).N(uv) = uv \overline{(uv)} = uv \overline{u} \overline{v} = u\overline{u} \cdot v\overline{v} = N(u)N(v).

Since complex conjugate preserves 1,1, we have N(1)=1.N(1) = 1.

\blacksquare

Proposition A4

Units of R=Z[5]R = \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}] are ±1.\pm 1.

Proof

Monoid homomorphisms preserve units, so units of RR have norm ±1.\pm 1. Since norm is positive, the units can only have norm 1.1.

Consider a2+5b2=1.a^2 + 5b^2 = 1. If b0,b \neq 0, the left-hand side is at least 55 and equality cannot hold. So all units of RR have zero imaginary component. The equation a2=1a^2 = 1 has two solutions, namely a=1a = 1 and a=1.a = -1.

Thus, the two units of RR are 11 and 1.-1.

\blacksquare

Proposition A5

Let R=Z[5].R = \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]. The elements 2,3,(1+5),(15)R2, 3, (1 + \sqrt{-5}), (1 - \sqrt{-5}) \in R are irreducible and pairwise nonassociate.

Proof

By direct computation we establish

  1. N(2)=4N(2) = 4
  2. N(3)=9N(3) = 9
  3. N(1+5)=6N(1 + \sqrt{-5}) = 6
  4. N(15)=6.N(1 - \sqrt{-5}) = 6.

Observe that there exist no integer solutions for a2+5b2{2,3}.a^2 + 5b^2 \in \{2,3\}. Since the norm is a homomorphism of multiplicative monoids, any failure of irreducibility among these elements would produce an element of RR whose norm is 22 or 3.3. No such elements exist. Thus we have established irreducibility.

By lemma 1.5 we know that associate elements p,qp, q of an integral domain (see A2) satisfy p=uqp = uq for a unit u.u. The only units of RR are 1-1 and 11 (see A4).

By direct computation we can verify that multiplying any of the elements under consideration by either of the two units never produces another, distinct element on our list.

Hence, these elements are pairwise nonassociate.

\blacksquare

Proposition A6

Let R=Z[5].R = \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]. The elements 2,3,(1+5),(15)R2, 3, (1 + \sqrt{-5}), (1 - \sqrt{-5}) \in R are not prime.

Proof

Observe that (1+5)(15)=6(1 + \sqrt{-5})(1 - \sqrt{-5}) = 6 and 6(2),6(3).6 \in (2), 6 \in (3). Elements of (2)(2) have norm divisible by 4,4, which (1±5)(1 \pm \sqrt{-5}) doesn’t have. Elements of (3)(3) have norm divisible by 9,9, which (1±5)(1 \pm \sqrt{-5}) doesn’t have. So (2)(2) and (3)(3) are not prime ideals.

Observe that 6(1+5).6 \in (1 + \sqrt{-5}). Elements of (1+5)(1 + \sqrt{-5}) have the norm divisible by 6,6, which neither 22 nor 33 have. So (1+5)(1 + \sqrt{-5}) is not prime.

Observe that 6(15).6 \in (1 - \sqrt{-5}). Elements of (15)(1 - \sqrt{-5}) have the norm divisible by 6,6, which neither 22 nor 33 have. So (15)(1 - \sqrt{-5}) is not prime.

\blacksquare

Proposition A7

Let R=Z[5]R = \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]. Then RR is not a UFD.

Proof

By A4 we know that 2,3,(1+5),(15)R2, 3, (1 + \sqrt{-5}), (1 - \sqrt{-5}) \in R are non-units. By A5 we know that these elements are irreducible and pairwise nonassociate. We also know that 6R6 \in R is a non-unit.

There are multiple ways to factor 66 into irreducibles:

23=6=(1+5)(15),2 \cdot 3 = 6 = (1 + \sqrt{-5}) \cdot (1 - \sqrt{-5}),

hence RR cannot be a UFD.

\blacksquare