Proposition

Let RR be a Euclidean domain with valuation v.v. Then RR admits a valuation vv' such that v(ab)v(b)v'(ab) \geq v'(b) for all non-zero a,bR.a,b \in R.

Proof

For each non-zero aR,a \in R, define v(a)v'(a) as the minimum of v(ab)v(ab) as bb ranges over non-zero elements of R.R.

We will now prove that RR is a Euclidean domain with respect to v.v'.

Suppose a,bRa, b \in R are non-zero, and ba.b \nmid a. Define the set SS of pairs (q,r)(q',r') such that a=bq+r.a = bq' + r'. Let (q,r)(q, r) be the pair minimizing v(r).v(r).

Suppose, for contradiction, that v(r)v(b).v'(r) \geq v'(b). Let rr' and bb' be such that v(r)=v(rr)v'(r) = v(r'r) and v(b)=v(bb).v'(b) = v(b'b).

Note that v(rr)v(r).v(r'r) \leq v(r).

Let a=q2(bb)+r2a = q_2(b'b) + r_2 with v(r2)<v(bb).v(r_2) < v(b'b). But then a=(q2b)b+r2.a = (q_2b')b + r_2. But note that

v(r2)<v(bb)v(rr)v(r),v(r_2) < v(b'b) \leq v(r'r) \leq v(r),

which contradicts minimality of rr.

\blacksquare