Proposition

Mathematical induction on N\mathbb{N} is equivalent to the existence of a well-ordering of N.\mathbb{N}.

Proof

Suppose that N\mathbb{N} is well-ordered and let SNS \subseteq \mathbb{N} such that ((bN):b<a    bS)    aS.\left((\forall b \in \mathbb{N}): b < a \implies b \in S \right) \implies a \in S.

Assume, for the sake of contradiction, that H=NSH = \mathbb{N} \setminus S is non-empty. Then, by well-ordering, HH has the least element aH.a \in H. Since all elements of N\mathbb{N} smaller than aa are in S,S, it must be that aS.a \in S. This is a contradiction.

Suppose, conversely, that the induction principle holds for N.\mathbb{N}. Let SS be a subset of N\mathbb{N} such that SS has no least element.

We will prove inductively that aSa \notin S for all aN.a \in \mathbb{N}. For the base case, if 0S0 \in S then 00 would be the least element of S.S. Thus 0S.0 \notin S. Suppose none of natural numbers less than nn are in S.S. If nSn \in S then nn would be the least element, so nS.n \notin S. Thus, SS has no members.

A non-empty subset of N,\mathbb{N}, therefore, has to have the least element.

\blacksquare