Proposition

Let RR be a commutative ring, II an ideal of RR, and aRa \in R such that aa is not a zero divisor. Then ReesR(I)ReesR(aI).{\rm Rees}_R(I) \cong {\rm Rees}_R(aI).

Proof

First, recall that (aI)n=anIn.(aI)^n = a^n I^n. This holds in any commutative ring.

We will construct the isomorphism φ:ReesR(I)ReesR(aI)\varphi : {\rm Rees}_R(I) \to {\rm Rees}_R(aI) explicitly.

First, let’s define a family of maps φn:InanIn\varphi_n : I^n \to a^nI^n as φn:xanx\varphi_n : x \mapsto a^n x. Clearly, this map is an RR-module homomorphism. We also define ψn:anInIn\psi_n : a^n I^n \to I^n as ψn:anxx\psi_n : a^n x \to x. We can do this, since multiplication by aa is injective and all elements of anIna^n I^n are multiples of ana^n.

These maps are inverses of each other and an RR-module homomorphism with an inverse (set-) function is an isomorphism. Now, let φ\varphi be the direct sum of all φn.\varphi_n. Similarly, let ψ\psi be the direct sum of all ψn.\psi_n.

Is it possible that φ\varphi fails to be the inverse of ψ\psi? For every nn, φnψn=idanIn\varphi_n \circ \psi_n = {\rm id}_{a^nI^n} and similarly ψnφn=idIn\psi_n \circ \varphi_n = {\rm id}_{I^n}. So φψ\varphi \circ \psi and ψφ\psi \circ \varphi are both direct sums of identity arrows and thus must themselves be identities.

Now we need to check that φ\varphi is an RR-algebra homomorphism. Recall (5.17) that (1,0,...)(1,0,...) is the multiplicative identity of any Rees algebra. Since all components of φ\varphi preserve 00, and since its zeroth component is the identity arrow on RR, φ\varphi preserves the multiplicative identity.

To verify that ψ\psi preserves multiplication, let u,vReesR(aI)u, v \in {\rm Rees}_R(aI) and observe that

(uv)n=p=0n(apup)(anpvnp)=anp=0nupvnp,\begin{align*}(u \cdot v)_n &= \sum_{p=0}^n (a^pu'_p) (a^{n-p}v'_{n-p}) \\&= a^n \sum_{p=0}^n u'_p v'_{n-p},\end{align*}

where umu'_m is just the mmth component of uu with the ama^m factor dropped. In other words, um=ψm(um).u'_m = \psi_m(u_m).

So,

(ψ(uv))n=ψn((uv)n)=ψn(anp=0nupvnp)=p=0nupvnp=(ψ(u)ψ(v))n,\begin{align*}(\psi(u \cdot v))_n &= \psi_n((u\cdot v)_n) \\&= \psi_n \left(a^n \sum_{p=0}^n u'_p v'_{n-p} \right) \\&= \sum_{p=0}^n u'_p v'_{n-p} \\&= (\psi(u)\cdot\psi(v))_n,\end{align*}

and this forces φ\varphi to be a ring homomorphism as well.

Thus, φ\varphi is an isomorphism of RR-algebras.

\blacksquare