Let RR be a subset of Z[t]\mathbb{Z}[t] consisting of polynomials with no degree-11 monomial in t.t.

Proposition A

RR is in fact a subring of Z[t].\mathbb{Z}[t].

Proof

Let f,gR.f, g \in R. For a degree-nn monomial to be present in f+gf + g it must be that it is present at least in ff or in g.g. So f+gf + g contains no degree-11 monomials.

For a degree-nn monomial to be present in fg,fg, there must exist a degree-m1m_1 monomial present in ff and a degree-m2m_2 monomial present in gg such that m1+m2=n.m_1 + m_2 = n. In the case when n=1,n = 1, it must be that one of the monomials has degree 11 and another has degree 0.0. But neither ff nor gg has a degree 11 term. Hence fgR.fg \in R.

Since degree-00 polynomials have no degree-11 monomials, ZR.\mathbb{Z} \subseteq R. This is sufficient to show that RR is a subring of Z[t].\mathbb{Z}[t].

\blacksquare

Proposition B

The common divisors of t5t^5 and t6t^6 in RR are 1,t2,t3,t4.1, t^2, t^3, t^4.

Proof

A divisor of tnt^n in RR is also a divisor of tnt^n in Z[t]\mathbb{Z}[t]. Since Z[t]\mathbb{Z}[t] is an UFD we need only consider the factors of tnt^n as candidate divisors (up to units).

This gives us a list t0,t1,t2,t3,t4,t5.t^0, t^1, t^2, t^3, t^4, t^5. However, t1Rt^1 \notin R and t5t^5 cannot be a divisor of t6t^6 since there is no vRv \in R such that deg(v)=1.\deg(v) = 1. Similarly, t4t^4 does not divide t5t^5 in R.R. Thus the only common divisors are, up to units, 1,t2,t3.1, t^2, t^3.

\blacksquare

Proposition C

There exists no gcd(t5,t6)\gcd(t^5,t^6) in R.R.

Proof

Suppose that, up to units, gcd(t5,t6)=t3.\gcd(t^5,t^6) = t^3. Then, since t2t^2 divides both, it should also divide t3t^3 but this cannot happen as tR.t \notin R. It is clear that ±t2\pm t^2 and ±1\pm 1 cannot be gcd(t5,t6),\gcd(t^5, t^6), since they are not divisible by t3.t^3. We conclude that no gcd(t5,t6)\gcd(t^5,t^6) exists in R.R.

\blacksquare