Proposition

Let RR be a UFD and let II be a non-zero ideal of R.R. Then every descending chain of principal ideals containing II stabilizes.

Proof

Consider the chain of principal ideals (j0)(j1)(j2)(j_0) \supseteq (j_1) \supseteq (j_2) \supseteq \ldots such that I(jn).I \subseteq (j_n).

In 2.01A1 we established that (a)(b)(a) \subseteq (b) if and only if F(b)F(a),\mathsf{F}(b) \subseteq \mathsf{F}(a), and that (a)=(b)(a) = (b) if and only if F(b)=F(a).\mathsf{F}(b) = \mathsf{F}(a).

From 2.06 we know that GCD exists in UFD’s. In particular, there exists the smallest principal ideal containing I.I. Let d=gcd(I).d = \gcd(I). By minimality, any principal ideal containing II must contain (d).(d). Thus, F(jn)F(d)\mathsf{F}(j_n) \subseteq \mathsf{F}(d) and moreover F(jn)F(jn+1).\mathsf{F}(j_n) \subseteq \mathsf{F}(j_{n+1}).

Suppose, for the sake of contradiction, that the chain fails to stabilize. Then we can select an infinite subchain where each inclusion is proper (jα0)(jα1)(jα2) .(j_{\alpha_0}) \supsetneq (j_{\alpha_1}) \supsetneq (j_{\alpha_2}) \supsetneq \ldots \ . This gives us an infinite chain of proper inclusions of multisets of factors F(jα0)F(jα1) .\mathsf{F}(j_{\alpha_0}) \subsetneq \mathsf{F}(j_{\alpha_1}) \subsetneq \ldots \ . However, the sub-multiset lattice of F(d)\mathsf{F}(d) is finite, since dd factors into a finite number of irreducibles, each with finite multiplicity, and cannot contain an infinite ascending chain. This is a contradiction.

\blacksquare