Proposition

Let NN, PP be submodules of an RR-module MM. Then

  • N+PN + P is a submodule of M;M;
  • NPN \cap P is a submodule of PP and N+PNPNP\frac{N+P}{N} \cong \frac{P}{N\cap P}

Proof

First, observe that N+PN + P is a subgroup of MM. Any element of N+PN+P is already an element of MM, and since RR-action on N+PN + P is inherited from MM, it is sufficient to make N+PN + P into a module, provided that closure holds.

Let nNn \in N and pPp \in P. For an arbitrary rRr \in R, consider r(n+p)=rn+rpr(n + p) = rn + rp. Since NN is a submodule, rnNrn \in N. Similarly, rpPrp \in P. This demonstrates that rn+rpN+Prn + rp \in N + P, as required.

Similarly, for NPN \cap P we only need to check closure. Let uNPu \in N \cap P and take an arbitrary rRr \in R. Since uNu \in N, ruNru \in N as well. Similarly, ruPru \in P. So NPN \cap P is a submodule.

Let K=NPK = N \cap P and consider the map φ:(N+P)P/K\varphi : (N + P) \to P/K defined as n+pp+K.n + p \mapsto p + K. It is clearly a surjective homomorphism. So im(φ)=P/K{\rm im}(\varphi) = P/K and ker(φ)=N\ker(\varphi) = N.

Let’s check that φ\varphi is well-defined. Let n1+p1=n2+p2n_1 + p_1 = n_2 + p_2. Note that n1n2=p1p2n_1 - n_2 = p_1 - p_2 and since n1n2Nn_1 - n_2 \in N and p1p2Pp_1 - p_2 \in P, we know that this difference lives in KK.

Finally, the canonical decomposition

N + P ( N + P ) / ker( ϕ ) im( ϕ ) P/K ϕ =

gives the required isomorphism.

\blacksquare