Exercise 7S.1.1

Proposition

Let real function denote a function f:RR.f : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}.

  1. There exist order-preserving and non-order preserving real functions.
  2. There exist metric-preserving and non-metric preserving real functions.
  3. There exist addition-preserving and non-addition preserving real functions.

Proof

Clearly, the identity function idR\id_\mathbb{R} is order-preserving, metric-preserving, and addition preserving.

Let f:RRf : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} be defined as xx2.x \mapsto x^2.

It is not order-preserving since 10-1 \leq 0 but f(1)≰f(0).f(-1) \not\leq f(0). It is not metric preserving, since 00.1=0.1|0 - 0.1| = 0.1 but 00.12=0.01.|0 - 0.1^2| = 0.01. It is not addition preserving, see freshman’s dream.

\blacksquare

Exercise 7S.1.11

Proposition

Let AA be a set with two partitions {Ap}pP\{A_p\}_{p \in P} and {Ap}pP.\{A_{p'}\}_{p' \in P'}. Suppose for each pPp \in P there exists a pPp' \in P' with Ap=Ap.A_p = A_{p'}.

Then (1) for each pPp \in P there exists at most one pPp' \in P' such that Ap=Ap,A_p = A_{p'}, and (2) for each pPp' \in P' there is a pPp \in P such that Ap=Ap.A_p = A_{p'}.

Proof

Let pP.p \in P. If no pPp' \in P' exists satisfying Ap=Ap,A_p = A_{p'}, we’re done. Suppose otherwise that there exists at least one suitable pP.p' \in P'. In that case, a different label qPq \in P' has to give a disjoint subset from Ap,A_{p'}, hence ApAq,A_{p'} \neq A_{q}, ruling out the possibility of multiple admissible pP.p' \in P'. This proves (1).

Fix pP.p' \in P'. Note that ApA_{p'} is necessarily non-empty, by definition of a partition. Let aApa \in A_{p'} be some element of that subset. Every element of AA belongs to exactly one subset among {AppP}.\{A_p \mid p \in P\}. So, suppose aAqa \in A_{q} for some qP.q \in P. By hypothesis, we have a corresponding label qPq' \in P' such that Aq=Aq.A_q = A_{q'}. Then aAq.a \in A_{q'}. By disjointness, aApa \in A_{p'} and aAqa \in A_{q'} implies Ap=Aq.A_{p'} = A_{q'}. Thus Ap=Aq,A_{p'} = A_q, as required for (2).

\blacksquare

Semigroup SS with 22-transitive Aut(S)\mathrm{Aut}(S)

1

Suppose SS is a semigroup such that Aut(S)\mathrm{Aut}(S) acts 22-transitively on SS. Then SS is a left- or right-zero band.

Proof

Suppose SS has at least two distinct elements, say, a,bS.a,b \in S. For each pair of distinct elements x,yS,x,y \in S, let fx,y(z)f_{x,y}(z) denote an automorphism such that fx,y(a)=xf_{x,y}(a) = x and fx,y(b)=y.f_{x,y}(b) = y.

Let xSx \in S and suppose that x2x.x^2 \neq x. Then fx,x2(a2)=x2f_{x,x^2}(a^2) = x^2 and fx,x2(b)=x2.f_{x,x^2}(b) = x^2. By injectivity of fx,x2,f_{x,x^2}, a2=b.a^2 = b. Similarly, fx2,x(b2)=fx2,x(a)f_{x^2,x}(b^2) = f_{x^2,x}(a) forces b2=a.b^2 = a. Then a=a4a = a^4 and hence a3a^3 is idempotent. Then, since fx,x2(a)=xf_{x,x^2}(a) = x and fx,x2(a4)=x4f_{x,x^2}(a^4) = x^4, x3x^3 is also idempotent. Thus xx3.x \neq x^3. Now, fx,x3(a3)=fx,x3(b)f_{x,x^3}(a^3) = f_{x,x^3}(b) forces a3=b,a^3 = b, and hence a=b2=b,a = b^2 = b, a contradiction. Thus, x2=x.x^2 = x.

Suppose aba.ab \neq a. Then fa,ab(ab)=a2b=ab=fa,ab(b),f_{a,ab}(ab) = a^2b = ab = f_{a,ab}(b), so ab=b.ab = b. Hence, ab{a,b}.ab \in \{a,b\}.

Let x,yS.x,y \in S. If x=y,x = y, then xy=y2=y,xy = y^2 = y, and we’re done. If xy,x \neq y, then fx,y(ab)=xy,f_{x,y}(ab) = xy, fx,y(a)=x,f_{x,y}(a) = x, and fx,y(b)=y.f_{x,y}(b) = y. If ab=a,ab = a, then xy=x.xy = x. Otherwise, xy=y.xy = y.

\blacksquare

Note

If SS is a finite semigroup such that Aut(S)\mathrm{Aut}(S) acts 11-transitively, then SS is a rectangular band. This fails in the infinite case, for example if SS is the additive semigroup of positive real numbers.

2

Suppose MM is a magma such that Aut(M)\mathrm{Aut}(M) acts 22-transitively on M.M. Let w1,w2F{a,b}w_1,w_2 \in \mathbf{F}\{a,b\} be elements of the free magma on two generators. If there exist distinct u,vMu,v \in M such that evu,v(w1)=evu,v(w2),\mathrm{ev}_{u,v}(w_1) = \mathrm{ev}_{u,v}(w_2), then this identity holds for all elements of M.M.

Proof

For any distinct x,yMx,y \in M there exists an automorphism sending uu to xx and vv to y.y.

\blacksquare

3

Suppose MM is a magma such that Aut(M)\mathrm{Aut}(M) acts 22-transitively on M.M.

Then MM is idempotent.

Proof

If MM is associative, earlier proof demonstrates that MM is a zero band. Suppose MM is not a zero band and let a,bMa,b \in M such that ab{a,b}.ab \notin \{a,b\}.

Suppose aa2.a \neq a^2. Then fa,a2(a2)=fa,a2(b)f_{a,a^2}(a^2) = f_{a,a^2}(b) so a2=b.a^2 = b. Also, fa,ab(a2)=a2f_{a,ab}(a^2) = a^2 and fa,ab(b)=ab,f_{a,ab}(b)=ab, hence a2=b=ab.a^2 = b = ab. This is a contradiction. Thus, a=a2a = a^2 and for any distinct xMx \in M such that xa,x \neq a, x=fx,a(a)=fx,a(a2)=x2.x = f_{x,a}(a) = f_{x,a}(a^2) = x^2.

\blacksquare