The Gilbert-Howie group H(9,7)H(9,7) is defined by a presentation

H(9,7)=x0,,x8xixi+7=xi+1 (0i<9)H(9,7) = \langle x_0,\ldots,x_8 \mid x_ix_{i+7}=x_{i+1}\quad \ (0 \leq i < 9) \rangle

with addition understood modulo 9.9. A recent publication1 notes it is unknown whether H(9,7)H(9,7) is hyperbolic.

In this note we will demonstrate that it is isomorphic to the cyclic group C37.C_{37}.

Define the group GG to be a semidirect product H(9,7)C9H(9,7) \rtimes C_9 with the presentation

x0,,x8,bb9=1, xixi+7=xi+1=bxib1,(0i<9).\langle x_0,\ldots,x_8, b\mid b^9=1,\ x_ix_{i+7} = x_{i+1} = bx_{i}b^{-1}, \quad(0 \leq i < 9) \rangle.

Using Tietze moves, we can simplify this presentation substantially.

First, eliminate x3x_3 since it can be expressed as x2x0.x_2x_0. Similarly, x4=x3x1=x2x0x1x_4 =x_3x_1=x_2x_0x_1 and so forth. We continue this procedure until our remaining generators are b,x0,x1,x2b,x_0,x_1,x_2 and the relations are

bx2x0x1x2x2x0x2x0x1x2x0x1x2b1=x0bx0b1=x1bx1b1=x2bx2b1=x2x0bx2x0b1=x2x0x1bx2x0x1b1=x2x0x1x2bx2x0x1x2b1=x2x0x1x2x2x0bx2x0x1x2x2x0b1=x2x0x1x2x2x0x2x0x1bx2x0x1x2x2x0x2x0x1b1=x2x0x1x2x2x0x2x0x1x2x0x1x2\begin{align*} bx_2x_0x_1x_2x_2x_0x_2x_0x_1x_2x_0x_1x_2b^{-1}&=x_0\\ bx_0b^{-1}&=x_1\\ bx_1b^{-1}&=x_2\\ bx_2b^{-1}&=x_2x_0\\ bx_2x_0b^{-1}&=x_2x_0x_1\\ bx_2x_0x_1b^{-1}&=x_2x_0x_1x_2\\ bx_2x_0x_1x_2b^{-1}&=x_2x_0x_1x_2x_2x_0\\ bx_2x_0x_1x_2x_2x_0b^{-1}&=x_2x_0x_1x_2x_2x_0x_2x_0x_1\\ bx_2x_0x_1x_2x_2x_0x_2x_0x_1b^{-1}&=x_2x_0x_1x_2x_2x_0x_2x_0x_1x_2x_0x_1x_2\\ \end{align*}

and

x2x0x1x2x2x0x2x0x1x2x0x1x2x2x0x1x2x2x0=x0x0x2x0x1x2x2x0x2x0x1=x1x1x2x0x1x2x2x0x2x0x1x2x0x1x2=x2\begin{align*} x_2x_0x_1x_2x_2x_0x_2x_0x_1x_2x_0x_1x_2x_2x_0x_1x_2x_2x_0&=x_0\\ x_0x_2x_0x_1x_2x_2x_0x_2x_0x_1&=x_1\\ x_1x_2x_0x_1x_2x_2x_0x_2x_0x_1x_2x_0x_1x_2&=x_2\\ \end{align*}

Now, define the free group automorphism φ:F3F3\varphi : F_3 \to F_3 as x0,x1,x2x1,x2,x2x0.x_0,x_1,x_2 \mapsto x_1, x_2, x_2x_0. It is easy to check that all of the bb-conjugation relations are consequences of this definition, thus making most of these relation redundant.

Also note that the relation

bx2x0x1x2x2x0x2x0x1x2x0x1x2b1=x0bx_2x_0x_1x_2x_2x_0x_2x_0x_1x_2x_0x_1x_2b^{-1}=x_0

is equivalent to φ9(x0)=x0.\varphi^9(x_0) = x_0. which is redundant, given that b9=1.b^9 = 1. Thus, we keep only the following bb-conjugation relations

bx0b1=x1bx1b1=x2bx2b1=x2x0\begin{align*} bx_0b^{-1}&=x_1\\ bx_1b^{-1}&=x_2\\ bx_2b^{-1}&=x_2x_0 \end{align*}

Now, we can cancel the redundant generators in the three relations:

x2x0x1x2x2x0x2x0x1x2x0x1x2x2x0x1x2x2(r3)x0x2x0x1x2x2x0x2x0(r1)x1x2x0x1x2x2x0x2x0x1x2x0x1(r2)\begin{align*} x_2x_0x_1x_2x_2x_0x_2x_0x_1x_2x_0x_1x_2x_2x_0x_1x_2x_2 && (r_3)\\ x_0x_2x_0x_1x_2x_2x_0x_2x_0 && (r_1)\\ x_1x_2x_0x_1x_2x_2x_0x_2x_0x_1x_2x_0x_1 && (r_2)\\ \end{align*}

Observe that φ(r1)=r2,\varphi(r_1) = r_2, hence this relator is redundant. Observe also that φ(r2)=x2r3x21,\varphi(r_2) = x_2r_3x_2^{-1}, so this relator is redundant as well.

Finally, note that

φ9(x0)=x2x0x1x2x2x0x2x0x1x2x0x1x2x2x0x1x2x2x0\varphi^9(x_0) = x_2x_0x_1x_2x_2x_0x_2x_0x_1x_2x_0x_1x_2x_2x_0x_1x_2x_2x_0

and hence

x2x0x1x2x2x0x2x0x1x2x0x1x2x2x0x1x2x2=1.x_2x_0x_1x_2x_2x_0x_2x_0x_1x_2x_0x_1x_2x_2x_0x_1x_2x_2=1.

But

φ2(r1)=x2x2x0x1x2x2x0x2x0x1x2x0x1x2x2x0x1x2\varphi^2(r_1)=x_2x_2x_0x_1x_2x_2x_0x_2x_0x_1x_2x_0x_1x_2x_2x_0x_1x_2

and thus

x21φ2(r1)x2=φ9(x0)x01=1.x_2^{-1} \varphi^2(r_1) x_2 =\varphi^9(x_0)x_0^{-1} = 1.

This proves r1r_1 to be redundant.

Finally, x1x_1 and x2x_2 can be eliminated, leaving us with just bx0b3=x0b2x0.b x_0 b^{-3} = x_0 b^{-2} x_0.

Let a=x0b3.a=x_0b^{-3}. Using this relation, we eliminate x0.x_0. The resulting relator is ba=ababbb.ba=ababbb.

This leaves us a short presentation: a,bb9,ba=ababbb.\langle a,b \mid b^9, ba=ababbb\rangle.

Observe that ba=ababbbba=ababbb can be put into the form (ba)1a1(ba)=b3.(ba)^{-1} a^{-1} (ba) = b^3. Thus, b9=1b^9=1 is equivalent to a3=1.a^3 = 1. This leaves us with our final short presentation.

a,ba3=1,ba=ababbb\langle a,b \mid a^3=1, ba=ababbb\rangle

Now, Tomas Rokicki demonstrated, in a MathOverflow answer 2 , that the group with the presentation

a,ba3=1,ab3a1b1a1b=1\langle a,b \mid a^3=1, \quad ab^{-3}a^{-1}b^{-1}a^{-1}b=1 \rangle

is finite and has exactly 333333 elements. Clearly, this group is identical to G.G.

We observe that 333/9=37333 / 9 = 37 and so H(9,7)=37.|H(9,7)| = 37. Thus, H(9,7)C37H(9,7) \cong C_{37} as claimed.

\blacksquare

Notes

More on the group

We can easily verify that the 333333 element group has the small groups ID [333,3],[333,3], generated by, for example,

a = (2,11,27)(3,21,16)(4,31,5)(6,14,20)(7,24,9)(8,34,35)(10,17,13)(12,37,28)(15,30,32)(18,23,36)(19,33,25)(22,26,29)

b = (1,34,23,2,9,19,28,25,26)(3,21,15,17,4,33,11,6,20)(5,8,7,32,36,10,31,24,14)(12,18,16,29,37,22,27,13,30)

From these, we can see that the generator shifting action of C9C_9 on H(9,7)H(9,7) is faithful. GroupNames page provides a nice overview of this group.

Software

Rokicki’s proof uses group theory software (kbmag, MAF) to find confluent and terminating rewrite system for this group. I was able to replicate this computation. This presentation (taken as a monoid presentation) was also discovered by Slava Pestov3. The page dedicated to this monoid includes a complete rewriting system and a certificate deriving the rewriting rules directly from the monoid presentation. As such, it constitutes an independent proof that this group is indeed finite, being an enveloping group of a finite monoid.

Attribution

All of the difficult work was done by Stefan Kohl 4 who asked about finiteness of this presentation of G,G, and Tomas Rokicki4 who proved finiteness of G.G. I am also deeply grateful to Slava Pestov, whose monoid word problem project led me to the discovery of Gilbert-Howie groups embedding into semidirect product groups that can have exceptionally short presentations. Analyzing multiple exceptional cases encountered in Pestov’s work, I was able to identify the pattern and discover the hidden significance of these peresentations. I am also thankful for him bringing the MathOverflow answer4 to my attention, and his indepependent verification of the finiteness of the monoid cousin of G.G.

Footnotes

  1. Chinyere, Ihechukwu and Williams, Gerald (2021) Hyperbolic groups of Fibonacci type and T(5) cyclically presented groups. Journal of Algebra, 580. pp. 104-126. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2021.04.003

  2. Tomas Rokicki (https://mathoverflow.net/users/536277/tomas-rokicki), Catalogue of groups with short finite presentations, URL (version: 2024-08-28): https://mathoverflow.net/q/477760

  3. Pestov, S. (2026). #22271 ⟨a, b | aaa=1, ababbb=ba⟩. Slava’s Monoid Zoo. https://monoids.net/2,2/22271.html

  4. Stefan Kohl (https://mathoverflow.net/users/28104/stefan-kohl), Catalogue of groups with short finite presentations, URL (version: 2022-06-30): https://mathoverflow.net/q/423541 2 3